<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Underfolding for Value - Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.donkeysdraw.com/2008/07/underfolding-for-value-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.donkeysdraw.com/2008/07/underfolding-for-value-part-2/</link>
	<description>...because Phil Hellmuth said so</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.donkeysdraw.com/2008/07/underfolding-for-value-part-2/#comment-47019</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 18:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.donkeysdraw.com/2008/07/underfolding-for-value-part-2/#comment-47019</guid>
		<description>That move never ceases to amaze me when they do it. The call down with AK no pair no draw on a paired 3 flush board when you've been betting the whole way is another one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That move never ceases to amaze me when they do it. The call down with AK no pair no draw on a paired 3 flush board when you&#8217;ve been betting the whole way is another one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
